Bernice Wenzel & Kurt Von Meier Lecturing at UCLA 5/9/1966

This 1966 lecture is entitled: The Human Agenda: "Prospects for Control of the Brain". It's been made available from the archives of the UCLA Communications Studies Department, digitized by the university in 2013. This is an audio recording, not a video. Kurt's comments begin around 36 minutes into the program. He speculates that if the human brain can be "programmed" by computer with the aesthetics of a given artist, would the art that is created be less human? Note that both Kurt's and Professor Wenzel's last names are misspelled in the title.

Aesthetics and Criticism - Working Notes - Art 102

sickle.jpg

These "working notes" from 1994 include Kurt's thoughts about the disciplines of aesthetics and criticism, and what students need to master in order to prevent such disciplines from becoming merely subjective exercise. He writes, "It is misleading to think of senses as clear-cut subdivisions of our psyche, however practical & useful for analytical purposes. This warns us about taking our modes of analysis to be characteristics of that which we are supposed to be examining." He goes on to include a lengthy list of published resources attendant to the topic. A earlier variation of these notes is also available, for the same class in 1993.

Unity and Alienation in Art & Letters

I_Ching.jpg

In this short essay, a book report if you will, Kurt writes about casting the I Ching and two books on his work table at that time, Kenneth Rexroth's More Classics Revisited and Wendy Steiner's The Scandal of Pleasure: Art in an Age of Fundamentalism. He gathers his comments together under the umbrella of "unity and alienation," a recurrent theme in his writing and teaching, and a set of feelings that spurred his personal interest in esoteric practice. 

Gender Bias in the Discipline of Art History

women_artists.jpg

As was so often the case, Kurt stepped forward to urge the University to assume a leading role in social and cultural transformation, in this case gender bias. He wrote a critique and set of recommendations about Sac State's art history program while Art Department Chair, a portion of which is excerpted here, and sent it to the President of the university. "Gender bias in the discipline of Art History is real, exists and persists on several different levels," he wrote, "and requires the thoughtful attention of peers, academic administrators and students as well as future textbook authors." In the light of issues surrounding gender bias today (2018) Kurt's observations were, as usual, progressive and timely.

A Sample of Kurt's Class Preparation

Kurt_Blackboard.jpg

As these notes from 1986 amply demonstrate, even after 20-plus years of teaching Kurt continued to make careful preparation for his classes. Though he often made notes in his ever-present blue-lined paper notebooks, in the 1980s he also kept notes by computer.

This particular batch found in his archives--in preparation for his Creative Art and Mythology class 113-D--were printed on perforated, punched paper designed for use in a "daisy-wheel" printer. There's a good deal of solid art history contained within these pages.

Some Noise about Hidden Noise

ball_of_yarn.jpg

The mystery of Duchamp's With Hidden Noise rattled around inside Kurt's head for decades, as this biographical account reveals. That this was so also reveals something about Kurt von Meier--that finding the source of the "hidden noise" within himself became something of an obsession. It's displacement into an object of sculpture cannot disguise the intent of his meticulous record-keeping and documentation of his own life, a strand of yarn stretching back over many decades. 

Audio Lecture: Kurt Schwitters

Schwitters used the word MERZ to describe the style of his work, derived from the second syllable in the German word for commerce.

Schwitters used the word MERZ to describe the style of his work, derived from the second syllable in the German word for commerce.

Iconoclastic but not malicious or mean-spirited; this is how Kurt describes the ground-breaking Dada-period artist Kurt Schwitters. This lecture delivered at UCLA in 1965 is straight-up art history; for those of you who are interested in the history of Dada and its relationship to art and life in the world of the 1920s, this recording provides a stream of Kurt's observations, understandings and insights. He does this as he describes a series of projected slides, their content, style and context. Picasso, Braque, Moholy Nagy and the cubists also are discussed. 
The recording runs about 45 minutes and takes a few moments to load.

Here are some links associated with the work of Schwitters:
Wikipedia (Schwitters)
Wikipedia (Art Style - Dada/Merz)
Google images